Dear all,
Can you please progress those two drafts, assuming that they're still ready.
Regards, Benoit
I2RS WG:
*The topology models have passed WG LC. These drafts will be
forwarded to the IESG for publication this week. *
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology
Sue Hares and Russ White
*From:* i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Susan Hares
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:09 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Cc:* 'Benoit Claise' <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>;
'Russ White' <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; 'Alia Atlas'
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject:* [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt
extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (
This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-04.txt
(9/20 to 10/4) and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt from
9/20 to 10/3.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/>
In considering this draft, the I2RS WG should consider:
1)Does the implementations of this draft in ODL open source code base
sufficient experience on the Yang drafts?
2)Does anyone know of other implementations of this model?
3)Do you believe this Yang model is stable enough to publish and
distribute to yang libraries?
We did a WG LC in August, but we suspect this got caught in the
August vacation email.
Sue Hares and Russ White
Co-chairs
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
