Ben: I have responded to Kathleen's comment with a lengthy set of questions. Would you engage in the conversation on that thread?
Summary of the issue: These modules and any module that refers to these must utilize the privacy and security concerns in the draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-17.txt. I see the authors referred to the ephemeral state, but left out a reference to draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements. I would suggest that the authors add this reference at the very least. Sue -----Original Message----- From: Ben Campbell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 5:19 PM To: The IESG Cc: [email protected]; Susan Hares; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-10: (with COMMENT) Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I agree with both of Kathleen's DISCUSS points. _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
