I just want to respond to Chris' note about the differences in eBird and the
Iowa Birds database because I think one statement may create some confusion
for Iowa birders.  Chris states " As others have noted, Iowa does have a
good system that is generally focused on reporting rarities and unusual
sightings".  I would submit that if this was indeed the case, it would take
Jim Dinsmore all of three minutes to write a summary of the summer season!
Please don't just report rarities!!!

I believe the biggest difference between the two is that Iowa Birds asks
reporters to do some preliminary work on their records and, especially
during migration, report on first, last and peak dates.  The culmination of
these data points give our seasonal editors a good picture of migration
throughout the state.  Jim is particularly interested in breeding
information for the summer season (hence the dropdown for breeding status)
and winter reports help paint a picture of the health of wintering
populations as well as the breadth of irruptive species movements into our
state.  

Volunteers have only so many hours to sift through the information available
to them and write a report.  I think if they had to try to make sense of
everyone's daily checklists, they may all resign on the spot!  I just took a
quick look at our data and 374 species (plus a few new ones to the state
list) have been reported since we started using this mechanism a few years
ago, hardly a place for just reporting unusual birds.  There are over 60,000
individual entries.

Our methodology for tracking on avian populations in the state has served us
well for over 75 years.  We have levels of peer review in place for unusual
sightings to assure that there is at least a modicum of scientific
legitimacy to what is published about Iowa birds.  This is part of one of
the most important functions of the Iowa Ornithologists' Union.

I hope that folks don't view this as a battle between Iowa Birds and eBird.
The technology evolves faster than we schmucks who are trying to keep up
with it can paddle!  If you think about it, in the past 15 years or so, we
have gone from people sorting information for the season on note cards to
entering data in a PC-based database to entering things on-line to
integrating things like seasonal reports, IBA data, and BBA data to entering
daily checklists on-line.  Unfortunately our business models don't always
mirror each other.  In some respects it has been much easier for the
developers of your PC database to create a mechanism to upload your records
to eBird than it has been for us to exchange information between larger
databases.  E-bird is big enough to demand that kind of attention.  Iowa
Birds is not.  Heck, being the lazy sort, if I could figure out a way to
export my AviSys records to Iowa Birds, I'd be all over that!

I appreciate Chris' offer to work with us and perhaps get to the best of all
worlds.  The IOU has been a champion of citizen science long before it was
cool!  We do have limitations on infrastructure - sheesh, a million records
a month!! - and volunteer time to make it all happen to everyone's
satisfaction.  There are only so many weekends in a year and it's hard to
totally redesign things when we have such an active group of people and
activity is constant.  For those of you who use eBird to record your
sightings, and those who might like to begin, all I ask is that you do so as
an adjunct to reporting to Iowa Birds and be patient as we try to make
things more seamless for everyone. It would be a shame if the picture of
Iowa birds got fuzzier in an effort to provide a higher level view.

Ann Johnson
Norwalk




---
Please contribute your sightings to our list; it is only as good as members 
make it!
---
Birding channel recommendation for FRS/GMRS radio use:
Primary selection; channel 5/0 , alternate selection; channel 6/0
---
This mailing list is sponsored by the Iowa Ornithologists' Union.  Membership 
available on-line at http://www.iowabirds.org/iou/membership.asp.
-----
You are currently subscribed to ia-bird as: [email protected]

Reply via email to