Check out Dolly - the mascot for LAMS, which is also an open source
project.  http://wiki.lamsfoundation.org/display/lams/Dolly+the+LAMbS

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Caroline Meeks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>
> My thinking is as follows.
>
> When a kid is using Sugar you want them emotionally engaged with their work
> and the other kids, who they probably know in real life.  The XO is a great
> icon for transparently representing other people and letting your use that
> as a symbol for a mental model of them.
>
> When we are teaching about Sugar, making powerpoints, books etc.  We want
> to emotionally engage out readers hindbrain, with cute images that helps the
> person learning about Sugar feel like they are having fun.  I'm getting this
> from a Kathy Sierra talk.  So a mascot is not something that appear in the
> UI of Sugar. Its a branding element we put in book and slide shows and to
> spark up web sites. Maybe we also make it a fictional kid character we use
> in examples.
>
> I like the animal, but  I think we need a cuter version then this first
> try.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Kevin Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:45, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'd strongly recommend against eliminating the XO as the core element
>> >> of the UI.  It was chosen specifically to represent children, and to
>> >> maintain the human/body metaphors where appropriate.  Substituting it
>> >> with anything other than a human likeness would be counterproductive,
>> >> I fear.
>> >
>> > Is it possible to "split the difference"?  It seems to me that by
>> > adding "wings" of a sort to the XO figure, you'd be able to
>> > approximate something that still looks human, yet also looks like a
>> > sugar glider -- or a kid with a hang glider.  Clearly related to the
>> > original, but like the Red Bull commercials say "Sugar gives you
>> > wings!" ;-)
>>
>> I don't think so.  That misses the point, which is that the children
>> themselves—not flying squirrels, however cute ;) —are represented as a
>> fundamental part of the interface.
>>
>> - Eben
>>
>> > --
>> > Ubuntu Linux DC LoCo
>> > Washington, DC
>> > http://dc.ubuntu-us.org/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> > IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Caroline Meeks
> Solution Grove
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 617-500-3488 - Office
> 505-213-3268 - Fax
>



-- 
Caroline Meeks
Solution Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

617-500-3488 - Office
505-213-3268 - Fax
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Reply via email to