On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 18:15, David Farning <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Walter Bender <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> === Sugar Digest === >>> >>> 6. GNOME: I will be representing Sugar on the GNOME foundation board >>> of advisers. If you have any Sugar-related concerns you would like >>> voiced, please let me know. >> >> An issue to consider is the feasibility of building Sugar on Gnome >> Mobile. Gnome is currently working on defining and branding Gnome >> Mobile. >> >> The biggest advantage would be the reduction in foot print. I have >> not looked into it far enough to know if gnome mobile provides the >> necessary services to support Sugar. > > I think we should be at least quite close, and you are right that > could be quite interesting to get sugar to run well on existing GNOME > Mobile distros, specially with all those MIPS and ARM-based netbooks > coming soon. > > And we'll have to keep working on reducing Sugar's memory footprint. > Tomue,
Do you have time to look into this? If it looks workable? We can start looking for Gnome developer with an interest in education:) david _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
