I'll bring it up on Wednesday at the GNOME meeting. -walter
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:34 PM, David Farning <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 18:15, David Farning <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Walter Bender <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> === Sugar Digest === >>>> >>>> 6. GNOME: I will be representing Sugar on the GNOME foundation board >>>> of advisers. If you have any Sugar-related concerns you would like >>>> voiced, please let me know. >>> >>> An issue to consider is the feasibility of building Sugar on Gnome >>> Mobile. Gnome is currently working on defining and branding Gnome >>> Mobile. >>> >>> The biggest advantage would be the reduction in foot print. I have >>> not looked into it far enough to know if gnome mobile provides the >>> necessary services to support Sugar. >> >> I think we should be at least quite close, and you are right that >> could be quite interesting to get sugar to run well on existing GNOME >> Mobile distros, specially with all those MIPS and ARM-based netbooks >> coming soon. >> >> And we'll have to keep working on reducing Sugar's memory footprint. >> > Tomue, > > Do you have time to look into this? If it looks workable? We can > start looking for Gnome developer with an interest in education:) > > david > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
