k: =. kirby urner  (partial quotes)
g: =. gerry lowry (reponses to k)   

k:  To say "your average student" subtracts info from my "pre-teen" as at least 
I was giving an age bracket.

g:  I'm referring to "average students" of any age.  Individual nurtured growth 
is relevant to me.
    Age is merely a less relevant factor.

k:  "Given my premise that the XO, because of design and appearance, is really 
designed for
      pre secondary school aged kids (more for elementary)

g:  like this one:  http://www.olpcnews.com/images/cherlin-xo.jpg             
B-)

     Sadly, I've not had the opportunity to experience an XO-1 personally and 
tactiley.
     Hence, I'm hopeful that the OLPC XO-1 will be useful to any person 
fortunate enough to have one.

k:  I am seeing the proposal to have J on the XO as a commitment to writing 
curriculum for the J language for pre-teens.

g:  currucula for all ages and abilities could be written for J on the XO.
     J's IDE "Studio, Labs..." capability facilitates electronic curricula for 
diverse age groups, et cetera.
     This in turn could substantially diminish need for paper based curricula.

k:  I'm a big believer in hybrid environments meaning we don't standardize on 
any one language or environment,
     aren't in any way trying to get everyone on the same page.  No "national 
curriculum" (blech),
     no lock-stepping with ETS, a strategy that has destroyed a generation 
already,
     so no need to keep repeating that same mistake over and over.

g:  I'm reminded of the computing world's oft repeated mantra:
       "If your only tool is a hammer, then all of your problems will tend to 
look like nails".
     Also, the Perl community's TIMTOWTDI (There IS More Than One Way To Do It).

    In my own words, many tools make fine minds.  Ken Iverson referred to 
"Notation as a tool of thought" *
    in his 1979 Turing award essay wherein Ken quoted A. N. Whitehead:
          "By relieving the brain of all unnecessary work, a good notation sets 
it free to concentrate
           on more advanced problems, and in effect increases the mental power 
of the race".

                *ACM SIGAPL APL Quote Quad, Volume 35 ,  Issue 1-2  (March, 
June 2007)
                      In honor of Kenneth E. Iverson; Pages: 2 - 31; 
ISSN:0163-6006 

                 Communications of the ACM; Volume 23 ,  Issue 8  (August 1980) 
table of contents
                 Pages: 444 - 465; ISSN:0001-0782 

                 ACM Turing award lectures book contents, Page: 1979; Year of 
Publication: 2007 
                 ISBN:0-201-0779X-X 

    So I'm not implying "J way or no way".  In fact, I'm very strongly opposed 
to such a restrictive idea.
    Rather, I'm simply saying J and the J IDE offer certain advantages for 
their inclusion in the
    "ships with installed" list for the OLPC XO-1.  Of course, I'm powerless to 
do more than suggest this.
    I'd also like to see C++, FORTH, LISP, LOGO, Pascal, and PROLOG as part of 
the "ships with installed"
    list as well as a version of MASM since the OLPC XO-1 CPU is programable 
with x86 assembly language.

k:  I believe in competing models, different states (nations, corporations) 
trying different approaches.

g:  I prefer co-operating models wherein we learn from each others different 
approaches with
    the goal of improving the learner's environment and positively affective 
the learner's success potential.

k:  For marketing purposes, we intimate that if your high school doesn't teach 
you any SQL, you
     should be concerned, very concerned

g:  Perhaps one should be even more concerned if there's too much emphasis on 
SQL ...
    there are other potentially better ways to stream and process data than via 
the relational
    database model.  Not every data mapping fits conveniently into tuples; 
otherwise,
    normalization might be more normal.

k:   ... calling for a nationalized curriculum with some top-down "advisory 
board" (guffaw).

g:  I think I'm agreeing with kirby here.  National goals are good things, e.g.,
    the spirit of the "No child left behind" act. **  

               **   http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html

    The problem is that nationalized curricula can too swiftly become a 
political vehicle
    for denial of services and thus restricting otherwise possible growth.  A 
not so
    abstract example is the absense in many locales of effective sex education 
and
    the corresponding number of illegitimate enfants born because of ignorance
    induced pregnancies caused by myths such as "You can't get pregnant the 
first
    time you have sexual intercourse".

k:  prodigies fall through the cracks way too often

g:  agreed.  apparently the world's smartest person is employed as a bartender.
    it pains me when imho a good mind goes to waste.

    at the same time, many minds could still be more productive and more 
rounded in humanistic
    and scientific ways with a better educational system ... too often some 
educational systems
    want to separate carpenters from financial wizards.  This practice forgets 
the fact that
    many of us are late bloomers and also that in the care of different 
gardeners, we might
    blossom in unforeseen ways.

k:  Great song about that guy [Srinivasa Ramanujan] 
http://www.archive.org/details/Ramanujan

g:  thanks!!!  

k:  http://worldgame.blogspot.com/search?q=Ramanujan


g:  more thanks!!!  Fuller would have liked to have seen an experiment where 
100 000 persons
    were paid NOT to work.  He felt one of them would be likely to make a grand 
contribution
    to society that would justify the experiment.  I like to think Fuller 
almost correct; imho,
    I think that collectively, they sum of the participants' contributions 
would justify the experiment.

    While we will not likely see such an experiment, it's nevertheless possible 
that
    equivalent societal benefits might occur if schemes (sic) like OLPC become 
successes.

k:  anyone not being taught any SQL in high school would count as a member of 
an oppressed group

g:  but nowhere nearly as oppressed as the children who die of hunger related 
diseases,
    one every few seconds.

k:  human resources (matching the right folks to the right positions).

g:  I've been around since before the term "human resources" was introduced 
AFAIK;
    when first introduced, the emphasis was on "human"; in the last few 
decades, the
    emphasis has shifted from "human" to "resources" and not in a positive way.
    i.e., humans are now seen as resources, specifically as things rather than 
as people.

Regards,
Gerry
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Reply via email to