On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:09:27PM +0545, Ties Stuij wrote: > > >> This for a public channel that can be > >> tracked by anyone if she/he wishes, so I don't really understand the > >> privacy-concerns. > > > > It's the difference between a conversation one might have with someone > > in a library where I know it's recorded, or don't. I would behave > > differently, and I like the knowledge that someone has to care enough > > to see the backlog or save good parts of it: > > Privacy concerns are valid argument of course.
My concern is just that gratuitous (and I think this case is clearly gratuitious, but that point is so meta I've lost interest) logging is something I personally think should be passively discouraged. But I think we've discovered the consensus (the opposite) and so I'm happy to move on. > But do debate my conclusion if you think the general gist of my > conclusion is wrong in your view. To be clear, I agree with your latest conclusion. > Sorry if it seems I now oversimplify the discussion, but in my view > the numbers above do seem to reflect people's opinions pretty ok, > and framing a conclusion like this at this point is the only way I > see to ever reaching an actual decision. Thanks for doing it. > > I myself underestimated reality a bit. I thought logging would be > pretty much a non-issue, and I see now that reaching an actual > conclusion through a mailing-list over a topic like this is a pretty > hard thing to do. Will be interesting to see how this plays out. Indeed. Thanks for persevering though :). > /Ties Martin
pgp1Hm4veXwBz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
