yes u are absolutly right... 0.84 is the focus now of every distro (maybe excepting debian) we will fix this all, but please, let us not sa y is a releasable usable product for educators until weve tested it ALL and we all agree that this is indeed the produuct (which i need nonconvicnig of) that will change the planet. Lets rock on, keep making it a better product... but stay connected to the people that can advise us on what works and wnat doesnt (INOT ndevs), but educators... I promise from my side to make a strong commitment to make that connection happen....
Happier thoughts, Nubae On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Aleksey Lim <alsr...@member.fsf.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > Reading this thread I've realized that there is a huge lack of target distro, > many people work for various distros and the fact is - there is now fully > featured sugar for at least one distro. I think we should choose *one* target > distro for incoming 0.84 release. I don't mean choose it forever, just one > distro which should be a glance facade for future 0.84 release with activities > included as much as possible. > > In fact, there is such distro - SoaS. It has some benefits: > - intended to be a live distro > - its not an official distro (we could do everything we want) > > Only one but, lack of coordination - I know what Speak demands, but I couldn't > add these dependencies w/o asking busy maintainer(busy not with SoaS). > > In that case I'm going to take that task. And that's my program: > - it will RPMs repo > - packaging activities in RPMs: > - I need formal(more formal then wiki) way to sort activities > for runnable/unrunnable > - now (before addons.s.o), there is no accepted strategy for resolving > dependencies for honey activities and packaging all activities could help > me > - there is some activities w/ old .xo bundles that do not include last > patches (TamTam, Speak+chat, etc); RPMs will include last dev code > - its a nice idea to install all these activities by one command (and even > deploy then preinstalled) > - do not bother about official status of RPMs; its custom distro not Fedora > > -- > Aleksey > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep