The problem is that 0.82 is not stable at all.... but being released in a stable Debian... Ubuntu LTS, btw... always backports its most stable packages to it, so no, its not the same. Otherwise the state it would be in as it was when it was released would be unusable... remember the cachepixmaps bug, cpu cycles gettting eaten to the max, sqlite issue with Firefox? Well, that got SRUd and fixed in days. Why can't there be something like Holger is suggesting... just a place where Debian and Ubuntu can work alongside each other. This Debian vs Ubuntu thing is just becoming silly now.... There are people in the field who are losing deployment opportunities because of this.... its not just a wishlist thing... Debian now contains the most unstable sugar release there is... is that where it wants to be? Affecting every *fork* and forcing us to hack around the issues?
kind Regards, David Van Assche On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Holger Levsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > we could prepare sugar 0.83 (or 0.84) in experimental, as long as we dont want > it in unstable... > > (I'd be happy to sponsor if someone provides those packages as branch in the > alioth gito repos.) > > > regards, > Holger > > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep > _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
