Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Sebastian Dziallas wrote: >> So my vision is that this SoaS is actually *the* way of distributing >> Sugar, as a SL product. If Sugar Labs doesn't think so, I'd have >> preferred to be informed much earlier. > > I don't think you're likely to find much support for that vision as > phrased. I think this may just be a wording problem.
Yeah, maybe I should have phrased it differently. > Some people here have distributed Sugar on hand-tuned hardware-specific > customized disk images. Some have distributed it using distro packages, > to be installed directly on pre-existing Linux installations. Some have > built emulator images, installed, configured, and ready to run on any OS. > Some have configured Sugar to run on thick NFS clients, or thin LTSP > clients. I'm strongly encouraging things like "$DISTRO Sugar Spin", "$DISTRO Sugar Remix", "Sugar on $DISTRO" and all those other possibilities. > SoaS is a great way to distribute Sugar, but it will certainly never be > "*the* way", as long as all these other people are around, working hard on > other distribution mechanisms. But I think there's major difference if something is a way to distribute Sugar, or if it's the Sugar Labs way of distributing Sugar. Martin explained & rephrased it very well in his last e-mail. --Sebastian _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
