2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas <[email protected]>: > Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an > "official" answer on this. Soon. > > Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a > Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?
Isn't there a wider question first? the one that asks if Sugar Labs is actually interested in being a distributor rather than just an upstream. I raised that question in my recent discussion and my feeling is that the responses basically said "well we should really just focus on being an upstream since we already are overworked there, but actually Sugar Labs is just a platform where everyone interested in Sugar can get together and run Sugar-related projects" Based on that, I'd say that SoaS is a fine project to sit under Sugar Labs but there shouldn't be a "primary way" of getting Sugar. Like other upstream projects, Sugar Labs should work with multiple downstreams (treating them equally) in order to achieve wide adoption of the software. Daniel _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
