On 15.12.2009, at 15:09, Daniel Drake wrote: > > I believe there are still various well-known 0.86 regressions (over > 0.84). For example, Record not working. These regressions are going to > be a huge headache to anyone who tries to upgrade, perhaps you could > squash a few of those.
Speaking of upgrade headaches, the most significant UI change in 0.84 is resume-by-default, which combined with the still not implemented versioning is possibly unhealthy in deployments. I can see many Journal entries overwritten for good. Has there been any experience with kids used to the 0.82 way who switched to a later Sugar version? And if needed, would it be easy for deployments to revert to not resuming by default? - Bert - _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
