Hi all, > In an attempt to line things up so that we can get efficiently > through Friday morning's meeting (and, I hope, nail those > Trademark notions through), Walter, Bernie, and I started a > meeting prep page.
Thanks! > 2. Are we missing any discussion points for trademark on > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Discussion_points? The new draft section 2 says "You may use the Sugar Labs Marks *with* prior written permission for the following purposes (subject to the other sections)", but in the old draft section 2 involved *not* needing prior written permission for those purposes, and the text appears to still be written that way: 2.b: To identify Sugar Labs software as a distinct component of a software offering. For example, "MyDistro, sweetened by Sugar" or other "<product>, <joined with> Sugar" language would be a use that does not require explicit written permission. Stating "you need written permission, for example, here's a case where you don't need written permission" doesn't make sense -- my preferred fix would be reverting to *not* needing written permission for the unmodified/bundling situations described in ยง2. What do others think? Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <[email protected]> One Laptop Per Child _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
