Hi,
> Chris, not sure how well this matches up with your understanding,
> but my reading of what you wrote makes it appear to me as if
> they're the same.
I like it!
I don't think you need to ask_SLOBs() about any "<product>, <joined
with> <SL mark>" formulation -- my reading of 2(b) is that such a
formulation (regardless of which <product> or <joined with> words
are used) would not require written permission.
So, here's a patch. :)
--- old 2010-01-20 22:56:35.000000000 -0500
+++ new 2010-01-20 22:56:41.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
if SL_software_bundled_as_distinct_component == True:
- if name in acceptable_list:
+ if name in acceptable_list ||
+ name.matches("<product>, <joined with> <SL mark>"):
return "Yes, you have clearance to use the marks."
else:
- ask_SLOBs("<product>, <joined with> <SL mark>")
+ ask_SLOBs("<your proposed use>")
(I think the way to apply both patches to the draft is just to change
"with prior written" back to "without prior written" in the preamble
of ยง2.)
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <[email protected]>
One Laptop Per Child
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
[email protected]
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
