Hi, Adam

I don't think this is relevant to this motion. Clearly, if such a negotiation were to happen, the Board could move to consider the matter in 'executive session'. In the meantime, there is no reason not to make votes public (and the discussion of them in the meetings
which is already public.)

Tony

On 06/21/2016 05:41 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com <mailto:walter.ben...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com
    <mailto:d...@lab6.com>> wrote:

        Hi

        I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each
        member of SLOB.

        On 7 June 2016 at 10:00, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com
        <mailto:d...@lab6.com>> wrote:

            Motion: to consider email votes on motions only valid if
            they are sent
            to both the SLOBs and IAEP mailing lists.




-- Cheers
        Dave

        _______________________________________________
        SLOBs mailing list
        sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org <mailto:sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org>
        http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs


    It is my belief (hope) that the only time a vote is only sent to
    one list rather than both is when there is an oversight by the
    sender. Vote should be public,


Should but not must.

There can be (have been, and might be in future be) times when Sugar Labs needs in-the-interim-confidential negotiations with billion-dollar sponsor/ally governments and orgs or all kinds.

Naturally merger/acquisition or multimillion-dollar sponsorship situations affect almost everyone, who cannot all be at the negotiating table, nor can all Board members cannot possibly always agree.

Hence it's generally a legal/fiduciary responsibility of the Executive Director (or similar) to consult privately with the Board in these kinds of high-stakes situations -- keeping as many as possible apprised of deliberations -- while preserving interim confidentiality wherever and whenever necessary to protect the full/strategic interests of 501(c)3 Sugar Labs.

    but if the vote is forwarded to both lists after the fact, it
    should still be valid.

    -walter

-- Walter Bender
    Sugar Labs
    http://www.sugarlabs.org


    _______________________________________________
    IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
    IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org <mailto:IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org>
    http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

-- Unsung Heroes of OLPC, interviewed live @
    <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep>http://unleashkids.org !



_______________________________________________
SLOBs mailing list
sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs

_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Reply via email to