Hi, Dave
This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion.
_At today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting [1], we discussed the
motion submitted by Sebastian Silva to finalize the transition from
GPLv2 to GPLv3 for the Sugar core libraries (Sugar Activity developers
are still free to choose whatever Libre license they prefer for their
work.) See [2]. I second the motion and bring it to you in an email vote.__
__
__Approve.__
____
__Tony Anderson__
__
_
_Approve._
__
_Sameer__
_
_Approve._
_
_
_BTW I'm worried about the fact that the Sugar-Web part (and so
Sugarizer too) use the Apache 2.0 Licence. _
_I'm not a specialist but what imply a Licence migration ?_
_
_
_ Lionel._
_
_
_+1 para GPLv3 motion_
_
_
_
_______________________
__Lic. José Miguel García__
__Montevideo - Uruguay_
_
__Approved!_
_
_
_Claudia_
Today at 8:04PM (ET) would be the deadline for the GPLv3 motion. (May 13
@ 8:04PM ET)
So this vote was 6 in favor and one abstention.
Tony
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
