Hi Laura I'd like to follow up on this thread :)
On 15 July 2016 at 23:39, Laura Vargas <[email protected]> wrote: > - Microsoft (laura -1: No private software funds shall get into our > accounts!) (dave +1: money is money, and almost all the funding sources > are private companies; the Nadella Microsoft is very different to the > Gates/Ballmer era and is about as ethical as Google, Facebook, Intel, or > IBM :) (Laura: don't apply, the requirement from grants providers to > resonate SL values is not negotiable as it stands for the whole learning > model we are proposing.) (Sean -1: No point adding Microsoft or Bill & > Melinda Gates Foundation to this list.) (Dave: You assert your own values > as "SL values", but the observable behaviour of SL and OLPC is not > consistent with them. What do you see as the difference between Google and > Microsoft? Why does SL take Google's money?) How does Google resonate with SL values more than Microsoft? Cheers Dave
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
