Hi Dave, "Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful."
This can be done with 100% free/libre software: no conflict with SL active members values. Regards, Laura V 2016-07-16 10:56 GMT-05:00 Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com>: > > Hi Laura > > I'd like to follow up on this thread :) > > On 15 July 2016 at 23:39, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org> wrote: > >> - Microsoft (laura -1: No private software funds shall get into our >> accounts!) (dave +1: money is money, and almost all the funding sources >> are private companies; the Nadella Microsoft is very different to the >> Gates/Ballmer era and is about as ethical as Google, Facebook, Intel, or >> IBM :) (Laura: don't apply, the requirement from grants providers to >> resonate SL values is not negotiable as it stands for the whole learning >> model we are proposing.) (Sean -1: No point adding Microsoft or Bill & >> Melinda Gates Foundation to this list.) (Dave: You assert your own >> values as "SL values", but the observable behaviour of SL and OLPC is not >> consistent with them. What do you see as the difference between Google and >> Microsoft? Why does SL take Google's money?) > > > How does Google resonate with SL values more than Microsoft? > > Cheers > Dave > -- Laura V. I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org Happy Learning!
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
