Ferdi, Seperti posting saya pertama tentang 2012, penemuan planet Nibiru/Marduk seluruhnya didasarkan kepada arkeo-astronomi yaitu "astronomi" yang didasarkan kepada temuan naskah2 atau artefak purba. "Astronomi" saya beri tanda petik karena astronomi mereka, yaitu para ahli arkeo-atronomi seperti Zecharia Sitchin dan Burak Eldem, tidak diakui oleh mainstream astronomy. Astronomi arkeo-astronomi adalah pseudosains menurut para ahli astronomi mainstream seperti NASA. Juga, metode arkeologi mereka dikritik oleh para ahli arkeologi atau para epigraf (ahli naskah kuno), misalnya publikasi dari Michael Heiser yang menantang temuan Nibiru Sitchin. Maka dapat dipastikan bahwa NASA atau National Science Foundation di Amerika tak percaya bahwa Nibiru ada, jadi tak perlu melakukan simulasi apa-apa. Saya masih menyimpan dua e-mail ilmuwan dari NASA, seorang astrophysicist, dan seorang lagi astrobiologist dari NAI (NASA Astrobiology Foundation). Silakan disimak di bawah. Mereka tak percaya Nibiru - itu hanya hoax atau a bunch of crap. Bagaimana dengan peristiwa2 masa lalu yang menyiratkan bahwa planet Bumi pernah dikunjungi makhluk cerdas ET (luar Bumi, extra terrestrial). Sama dengan kasus UFO - ya ada yang percaya, ada yang tidak. salam, awang LAMPIRAN e-mail 1 (anonim, astrophysicist dari NASA) I'm an astrophysicist with NASA and National Science Foundation funding and here's my take on it: Nothing spectacular will happen in 2012 (unless you count the Olympics in London). It is just a myth which mysteriously propagates (mostly because of the History Channel and YouTube)
The Mayan culture/society/way of life is long since dead Therefore as an end to "the world" 2012 was a wildly optimistic estimate for them! And anyway – that is the wrong interpretation of the whole calander thing – it’s just the end of a cycle. And since calendars are based on astronomical motions of one kind or another, they are inherently cyclic. Our western calendar ends on December 31st every year! Planet X/Nibiru does not exist. If it did we would have found it by now. We have mapped the sky in the infrared several times in the last 25 years (including WMAP, IRAS etc), and it would show up. It is not there. We would have found it if it existed. So all the nonsense about the return of Nibiru/Planet X is just that – nonsense There is no scientific evidence for the existence of Nibiru Furthermore, at the distance it must be to hit us in a little over 4 years, it would be reflecting enough light from the sun to be detectable. Thanx to previous question from Brant and answer from bikenbeer2000, we know how bright it should be by now – it would have a apparent magnitude of 7.4 – which would not be visible with the naked eye – but easily visible in a modest telescope and would have been spotted by amateur. If there was a conspiracy to keep it quiet – it would be out of the bag by now. Ask someone where it is supposed to be, get a pair of binoculars and look for it. The videos on YouTube that purport to have evidence are disingenuous to say the least. They put together pictures of other objects (e.g. Jupiter, comets even a dust shell around a distant red giant star) and try to scare people. There is no validity to their claims. They present NO EVIDENCE at all. As for the predicted catastrophes – the most popular one seems to be the Pole Shift! The sun will have a pole reversal that year – it has one every 11 years – it is not a problem. The earth’s magnetic field is less predictable – but is still nothing to worry about: we know that the magnetic field does not collapse in the process of reversing polarity- if it did, there would be major extinctions that correlate with the geologic record for pole reversals - there is no correlation. e-mail 2 (David Morrison, senior scientist NAI) I am really sorry that these crazy Nibiru claims have upset you. I don't want to keep answering these questions about Nibiru, but let me say once more as clearly as I can, for you and the other questioners: Nibiru does not exist. NASA has never discovered or detected Nibiru or anything remotely like it. The handful of dwarf planets that astronomers have discovered beyond Neptune are on stable orbits that will never come into the inner solar system, let alone threaten Earth. Nothing will happen in 2012. Nibiru is simply a fake, a hoax, the result of a small religious cult that is unfortunately scaring lots of people with totally false stories. --- On Wed, 2/25/09, kartiko samodro <[email protected]> wrote: From: kartiko samodro <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [iagi-net-l] Re: [Geo_unpad] 1.650 BC ada apa ? To: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 10:25 AM Pak Awang, apa sudah ada publikasi ilmiah dari badan internasional (nasa, lapan dsb) tentang pertemuan dari planet nibiru ini . Kalau memang hal ini begitu besar impactnya saya kira sudah ada simulasi tentang impactnya dengan memperhitungkan kecepatan , massa dan jarak antara planet nibiru dan bumi. On 2/23/09, Awang Satyana <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pak Agung, > > Seperti posting saya tentang 2012, dan untuk yang percaya bahwa planet > Nibiru akan melakukan "rendezvous" dengan Bumi pada 2012; maka semua bencana > global yang Pak Agung ceritakan di bawah pada 1650 BC (kebanyakan publikasi > menyebutnya 1649 BC) itu gampang saja dicari penyebabnya. Nibiru atau > "Marduk" dalam bahasa Babilonia punya periode waktu edar 3661 tahun. > Rendezvous-nya yang terakhir dengan Bumi adalah pada 1649 BC. Rendezvous > berikutnya adalah 1649 BC + 3661 tahun = 2012 AD. > > Setiap rendezvous itu menyebabkan rentetan gempa besar di berbagai belahan > dunia dan erupsi gunungapi berskala VEI 6-7. Menjelang 1649 AD, banyak gempa > tercatat dari India sampai Turki (perhatikan bahwa wilayah ini secara > tektonik aktif -bagian dari Anatolian Fault). Kemudian puncaknya dengan > meletusnya gunungapi Thera (Santorini) di kawasan Laut Tengah bagian timur > yang memunahkan kebudayaan Minoan (legenda the Lost Atlantis), memundurkan > bangsa Mesir ke selatan (sehinga suku Hyksos mendudukinya). Di periode yang > sama terjadi juga erupsi Gunung Vesuvius di dekatnya. > >
