Curiga (boleh dong ....he he he), jangan-jangan laporan ini dirilis tujuannya untuk mendesak bang Obama membuka sebanyak mungkin lahan2 untuk explorasi dan exploitasi unconventional gas. Selain untuk menohok balik gerakan kaum environmentalist dan green yang menentang keras hydrofracc shale gas.
Maklum pemilu bulan November dan penciptaan lapangan kerja menjadi salah satu kunci penentu apakah si Anak Menteng bakal terpilih kembali.... ------------------------------ On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 4:37 PM ICT Rovicky Dwi Putrohari wrote: >2012/6/14 o - musakti <[email protected]> > >> Oom Avi, >> Yang jelas shale gas di Amrik sudah terbukti ekonomis... >> Nyatanya shale gas revolution berhasil menurunkan harga gas domestik di >> henry hub sampai dibawah 3 dollar per MMBTU.... Dan konon sebentar lagi US >> akan jadi LNG exporter.... >> > >Salah satu dampak yang justru lebih penting ketimbang keekonomian adalah >menciptakan lapangan kerja seperti berita dibawah ini > >rdp >========= >IHS: Unconventional Gas to Create Nearly 1.5 Million US Jobs by 2015 >Posted on Jun 13th, 2012 > >Natural gas production from shale, coal bed methane and tight sands is >expected to generate significant job creation, economic growth, and revenue >for federal, state and local treasuries throughout the U.S. in gas >“producing” and “non-producing” states alike, according to a new IHS Global >Insight study. > >The economic contributions are realized throughout the lower 48 states and >the District of Columbia in both the twenty producing states and the >twenty-eight non-producing states. Unconventional gas activity supported >more than one million jobs in 2010, and it will grow to support nearly 1.5 >million by 2015, says the study, which is the second in a series. > >The new report, The Economic and Employment Contributions of Unconventional >Gas Development in State Economies, examines unconventional gas activity – >a growing subset of the total natural gas industry. The report found >substantial growth in jobs and economic activity in unconventional plays >over the past decade. The report is a companion to an IHS Global Insight >study on shale gas economic and employment contribution released in >December. > >“At a time when the U.S. economy is slowly recovering from the Great >Recession and struggling to create enough jobs to sharply reduce the >unemployment rate, the growth in shale and other unconventional natural gas >production is a major contributor to employment prospects and the U.S. >economy,” said IHS Vice President John Larson, the lead author of the >study. “As this report makes clear, these benefits spread beyond producing >states to deliver positive impacts across the country.” > >The dramatic impact on employment and the economy from unconventional gas >activity reflects its significant capital intensity requirements, the >ability to source capital equipment and services from US sources, the >coast-to-coast structure of the supply chain and the quality of jobs >created by the industry. > >Between 2010 and 2015, the Top 10 producing states (as ranked by >unconventional gas-related employment) – Texas, Louisiana, Colorado, >Pennsylvania, Arkansas, Wyoming, Ohio, Utah, Oklahoma and Michigan – will >experience a compound annual job growth rate of nearly 8 percent, with >Pennsylvania and Colorado leading with expected compound annual growth >rates of 14 percent and 10 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, total US >employment is expected to grow at a significantly lower average rate of 1.6 >percent during the same period. > >Of the nearly 1.5 million unconventional gas activity jobs contributing to >the economy by 2015, nearly one-fifth are projected for non-producing >states. The Top 10 non-producing states (as ranked by jobs growth due to >unconventional gas development) in 2015 are projected to be California, >Florida, Georgia, Missouri, North Carolina, Indiana, Wisconsin, Minnesota, >Tennessee and Maryland, supporting the industry through the extensive >supply chain and service jobs necessary to support development. > >“When it comes to unconventional natural gas, a state does not need to have >a gas play to benefit economically,” Larson added. > >Among the study’s other key findings: > >- Unconventional gas activity accounted for 53 percent of total U.S. >natural gas production in 2010 and is projected to rise to 79 percent of >total U.S. natural gas production by 2035. >- Nearly $3.2 trillion in cumulative investments in the development of >unconventional gas are expected to fuel the increase in production between >2010 and 2035. >- By 2015, the annual contribution of unconventional gas activity to U.S. >gross domestic product is projected to reach nearly $197 billion, more than >$22 billion of which will be from non-producing states. In total, the >annual contribution is expected to more than double by 2035 to almost $332 >billion. >- Government revenue from unconventional gas activity is projected to reach >more than $49 billion annually by 2015 and will continue to rise, to just >over $85 billion by 2035. Over the study’s entire 25-year horizon, >unconventional gas is expected to generate nearly $1.5 trillion in total >government revenue. > >The earlier IHS shale gas study, The Economic and Employment Contributions >of Shale Gas in the United States, presented the economic contributions of >shale gas specifically in terms of jobs, economic value and government >revenues through 2035, as well as the broader macroeconomic impacts on >households and businesses. Whereas the original report examined the >contributions at a national level, this report builds upon the original >work by adding analysis of the other unconventional natural gas activities >(coal bed methane and tight sands) and further distributes the results to >the state level. > >The studies were commissioned by America’s Natural Gas Alliance (ANGA). IHS >Global Insight offers an independent assessment and is exclusively >responsible for all of the analysis, content, and conclusions contained in >the studies. > >The Economic and Employment Contributions of Unconventional Gas Development >in State Economies report is based on the IHS CERA analyses of each play >which calculate the investment of capital, labor, and other inputs required >to produce these hydrocarbons. The economic effects of these investments >are then calculated using the proprietary IHS Global Insight economic >impact assessment and macroeconomic models to generate the contributions to >employment, GDP growth, labor income, and tax revenues that will result >from the higher level of unconventional gas development. > >http://www.lngworldnews.com/ihs-unconventional-gas-to-create-nearly-15-million-us-jobs-by-2015/ > >----- > > >-- >*"Sejarah itu tidak pernah usang untuk terus dipelajari"* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PP-IAGI 2011-2014: Ketua Umum: Rovicky Dwi Putrohari, rovicky[at]gmail.com Sekjen: Senoaji, ajiseno[at]ymail.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jangan lupa PIT IAGI 2012 di Jogjakarta tanggal 17-20 September 2012. Kirim abstrak ke email: pit.iagi.2012[at]gmail.com. Batas akhir pengiriman abstrak 28 Februari 2012. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to: iagi-net-unsubscribe[at]iagi.or.id To subscribe, send email to: iagi-net-subscribe[at]iagi.or.id For topics not directly related to Geology, users are advised to post the email to: [email protected] Visit IAGI Website: http://iagi.or.id Pembayaran iuran anggota ditujukan ke: Bank Mandiri Cab. Wisma Alia Jakarta No. Rek: 123 0085005314 Atas nama: Ikatan Ahli Geologi Indonesia (IAGI) Bank BCA KCP. Manara Mulia No. Rekening: 255-1088580 A/n: Shinta Damayanti IAGI-net Archive 1: http://www.mail-archive.com/iagi-net%40iagi.or.id/ IAGI-net Archive 2: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iagi --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: IAGI disclaims all warranties with regard to information posted on its mailing lists, whether posted by IAGI or others. In no event shall IAGI or its members be liable for any, including but not limited to direct or indirect damages, or damages of any kind whatsoever, resulting from loss of use, data or profits, arising out of or in connection with the use of any information posted on IAGI mailing list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
