On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:35:12 +0100, Gilles Bayon wrote: > I think source is more appropriate then Mapper.
I'm was just trying to minimize change, Gilles. AFAIK, we don't want to keep both the DataMapper and DataAccess solutions in the same folder indefinitely. The layout we've been circulating has one folder for DataMapper and another for DataAccess. ---- /branches (as required) /tags */java **/releases ***/2.1.0 */cs **/releases ***/1.5.0 /trunk */site */cs **/mapper <-- DataMapper **/dao <-- DataAccess **/docs **/npetshop **/tutorial */java **/mapper **/dao **/docs **/jpetstore ---- I'm just not sure of the state of the DataAccess versus DataMapper solutions. I don't use the DataAccess subproject myself, and I'm reluctant to touch it. If they can live in separate folder now, then lets move the DataAccess.sln and related resources to "/trunk/cs/dao" If they need to stay together for now, I'd suggest that we keep them both under "mapper", so that we only have to move one again later. -Ted.
