Maybe make that XPARM - you can just bet there will be JES exits (at least)
out there somewhere that go looking for "PARM".

I don't have any further substantive offering to those  of Peter and
Jeffrey - I can see potential problems everywhere.
Man it must be a bitch trying to shoe-horn in changes so thay are backward
compatible - just look at all the contortions required for ARCHLVLV 2.

Shane ...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeffrey D. Smith"


> Just off the cuff, I am thinking that a new JCL keyword,
> like PARMX= should be used to declare that the program
> really understands the longer parameter string.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to