Peter,
I vote for extending the current JCL processing. A quick perusal of [a lot of] our current source tells me that a) the original parm string isn't moved to an internal program area and b) the length is checked before the parm data is parsed.
Now if the length ever gets to be bigger than 32767, I *will* have to do something about those pesky LH instructions. I'm not really concerned about that possibility.
Bob
Peter Relson wrote:
We all know and love (well, at least know) that the limitation in JCL for PARM= is 100 total characters. We are thinking (again) about expanding this, and would like to hear your thoughts.
> <snip>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
