In a recent note, ibm-main said:
> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:43:05 +1000
>
> > ...APARs extended the rules, but it appears that such changes were not
> > reflected back to the manuals.
>
> This is a general "beef" now.
> TNLs are consigned to history. Nowadays, changes (e.g. DOC) introduced by
> APAR/PTF are only reflected *forward* (from current/next) into the manuals.
>
> Pisses me off severely that I have to seek out current level (say 1.6)
> manuals on the net to analyse messages I see on z/OS 1.4.
>
The word "back" was my bad choice. I don't believe they got reflected
in any direction. From my PMR on the problem I experienced:
=********************* -5695DF102 - 01/04/25-19:56-
***********************************************************************
... I suppose we could also change the
documentation, but I'm not ready for that yet. I'd like to first see if
there's any additional fallout from OW46399.
OS/390 2.9. April 2001. Does the doc yet reflect the changes?
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
