The routine are also used in batch as well otherwise I would rewrite them.... Richard
"Craddock, Chris" wrote: > > My problem is this one. > > > > I have this routine that is notreentrant and needs to be OS > > loaded (instead of CICS loaded) > > Why? If its a transaction program, CICS will take care of it. > What is special about this program that it has to be treated > differently? > > > and while using storage protection in CICS is has to be in > > key9 because the program updating it, is running key9. Right > > now the key9 program loads it and it gets in Key 8, fetch > > protected storage. So there other programs reading it gets a > > fetch protection exception. > > There is (as we have said already) no legal way to get what you > want. Contents supervision simply does not work the way you seem > think it ought to. You haven't given any reason why the application > would need to behave the way you're trying to make it behave and > the techniques you've offered up so far simply won't work either. > > So, maybe I'm a "principles of operation policeman" but I only > told you the truth. I also offered to help you figure out how to > solve your problem. If you could describe the problem you'd get > an answer, from me or any of the other "pops cops". Describing your > non-solution, to an undescribed application problem isn't getting > you any closer to an answer. > > CC > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
