John, I'll take your word on the automation coding time. For now, I off to search the Internet for the meaning of "boustrophedon". <grin>
Bob -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john gilmore Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 10:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: IBM VSAM statistics are often bogus > The penance for both of us is to write "Invalid data is invalid data" >ten thousand times. Under ISPF EDIT, it should take us roughly ten >seconds. <vbg> A more exiguous penalty is clearly called for. My preference would be to require you format it in boustrophedon parametrically in full n-character lines, n <= 131, which it would take you rather longer to automate. John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721 USA LEGAL DISCLAIMER The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Seeing Beyond Money is a service mark of SunTrust Banks, Inc. [ST:XCL] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
