On 13 Jul 2005 16:01:06 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward E. Jaffe) wrote:

     In open code, people often coded
LABEL     EQU   *
but, if there was an odd-length constant prior to it, it would not be halfword aligned, so people started using the DS 0H technique, instead. (Also, IIRC, the TEST instruction has more information if you code as DS 0H.)


Of course, with modern HLASM it's preferable to code 'DC 0H' rather than the 'DS 0H' as required by older assembler implementations.

Would you please elucidate? IIRC, DS 0H will fill with zeros just as will DC 0H. Why is the latter preferable?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to