In a recent note, Ed Gould said: > Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:35:19 -0500 > > On Jul 30, 2005, at 11:21 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > > -------------------------SNIP--------------------------------- > (I believe you SNIPped the wrong half of my message. The first section, which you deleted, referred to M & C; the second half, which you retained, dealt with the program's behavior versus the RM.)
> You should THANK IBM for at least providing a messages and codes > Manual:-) > No. In this case, I found the message self-explanatory (notwithstanding that in the culture of this list the modal view is that "self-explanatory", when applied to messages, is pejorative). M & C adds only misinformation. In this case, the programmer would be better off absent the M & C text. -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
