In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 08/04/2005
at 11:44 AM, Jeffrey Deaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I was not looking to spend a good deal of time on the phone with them
>and hardly have to the knowledge to argue the points well, no simply
>nodded my head (sort to speak). But now that I'm thinking about it,
>neither sounds completely valid. Isn't VIO simply storage of another
>sort and the access methods used to get there are the same as those
>that get to my disk?
No. VIO adds an extra layer of simulation; FBA -> ECKD -> CI -> CKD
instead of FBA -> ECKD for DASD temporary files or FBA -> ECKD -> CI
for data spaces.
>And couldn't all temporary datasets use secondary allocations within
>VIO?
Yes.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
