Hi Bruce,
Nope.
I mean from ECSA to CSA and it's much worse because we load a copy for each
IMS subsystem. You can load some IMS modules in LPA if you had IMS systems
sharing modules in MLPA which would normally be in CSA. This is a common
technique for saving CSA space where you have multiple IMS systems at the
same maintenance level. Systems which are sharing the modules specify the
SRCH=1 to search LPA first when fetching modules.
We don't.
We stopped when we first detected this which was in the first IMS subsystem
where it was implemented. I have some systems with a half dozen copies of
IMS running on them and they are not using the SRCH=1 option so the VSCR
impact would have been unacceptable.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(office) 301.986.3574
"Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast..."
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 3:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VSCR 447K <16M CSA IMS APAR PQ87302 PE will be fixed by PK10018
>
>
>PQ87302/UK03991 moved a 447K load module from ECSA to CSA.
>
You mean from EPLPA to PLPA (below-the-line) I think, assuming that
module is LPA. Same result, it reduces the available below-the-line
PVT area for everyone.
--
Bruce A. Black
<>
====================
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email/fax is prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all paper and electronic
copies of the original message.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
