--- Rob Wunderlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:37:51 -0700, Barry Schwarz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >The "stolen" status means the alias used to belong to a different > >load module. Any chance that could be part of the problem? > > Was the linkedit run on the same image as where the abend106 > occurred? Is > this an LLA managed lib? > > -Rob
Barry, Bob, 1. The original ALIAS for the LMOD showed ???????? in the ALIAS-OF field. I found it weird, to say the least, that's why I recreated the ALIAS for the LMOD using the Binder; this is the only way I know to create an ALIAS for a LMOD. The ??????? ALIAS was created by a vendor's internal tool. 2. Yes, the linkedit ran on the same image as where the Abend occurred and, yes, the library was LLA managed. However, the abending STCs had and still have a STEPLIB DD card pointing to EXEC PGM=real_lmod. It means to me that the STCs doesn't use LLA services at all. A couple days later we IPLed this very LPAR. Before the IPL the person responsible for the product recreated the weird ???????? ALIAS. Guess what ? The STCs still get Abend106 ... Something must have changed, but I don't know what. But at this point I doubt I caused the error by defining my ALIAS. Thanks. Walter Marguccio ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
