On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 11:14:42 EDT Bill Fairchild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>In a message dated 8/28/2005 8:34:59 A.M. Central Daylight Time, :>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: :>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/23/2005 :>at 01:00 PM, Bruce Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: :>>An authorized program can change the DEB extents to access other :>>tracks on the volume, but AMASPZAP does not so so. :>When did that change? :>There is almost always more than one way to accomplish any given task. :>E.g., was IMASPZAP/AMASPZAP/SUPERZAP in the PPT (Program Properties Table)? If :>so, then it could bypass the normal data set integrity functions of the :>control program without having to alter a DEB's extents. Just speculation, since I :>never read AMASPZAP's source code to see how they were doing things. Which PPT bit does that? If one wishes to use EXCP, a DEB encompassing the volume must be built. The DSI bit just skips the ENQ. -- Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
