In a recent note, Jay Maynard said: > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 07:52:46 -0500 > > Heck, I'd settle for a Java version that wasn't tied to the Windows > platform, IBM is not about to do anything for Mac OS X specifically, but > Because OS X abandoned the Power PC? (In turn because the Power PC ceased to meet the requirements of laptops)
> a platform-independent Java version (you know, what Java was supposed to be > all about) woul let me run it there anyway. > Does the subjunctive mean you perceive Java has failed to meet its objective? Has Java become platform-sensitive, outcome of lawsuits notwithstanding? -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
