Hi Bob, The PROPLIST that are available are documented in the z/OS 1.10 manual section 2.14. There is no modification bar for the Command.PREFIX.AddGenChar, so I guess it applies to 1.9 as well. This is only for the prefix command, not the extension to H and ST that the APAR mentions (and I hadn't realised when I replied before). As well as Command.PREFIX.AddGenChar , we also use the Panel.DA.DynamiczAAPCols setting (and no special exit coding). I think IBM should have used the same method for this APAR rather than expecting exit code.
Best regards, David Tidy Tel:(31)115-67-1745 IS Technical Management/SAP-Mf Fax:(31)115-67-1762 Dow Benelux B.V. Mailto:[email protected] -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B. Sent: 01 August 2009 12:01 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SDSF PREFIX Enhancement (UK44477) Well, I am glad two friends of mine can have a laugh at my expense. :-) However, bad subject line or not, the example in UK44477 *was not* complete in its intended purpose. I never knew of UPRO1GPF in 1.9 as I was merely applying all current maintenance to a new 1.10 deployment. When I saw UK44477, I was led to believe that was all that was needed to be coded. Nevertheless, I made the modification as Bob indicated and can report that after an LLA refresh and a re-invocation of SDSF, the code works as indicated. Virtual beer to Mr. Rutledge. Nah. Forget that. A real one when we next meet again at SHARE or Bob comes to DC to visit. As to my ability to confuse Mark, life does have its little pleasures! (kidding back, Mark) When time permits, I do still intend to follow up on David Tidy's post. Our ISFPRM00 is HUGE and hasn't been substantially modified in ten years. Who knows what other nice enhancements have been overlooked. Bob -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 5:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SDSF PREFIX Enhancement (UK44477) On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:59:04 -0400, Bob Rutledge <[email protected]> wrote: <big snip> >> >Bob (Richards) indicated that he wanted the generic character appended to >prefix, I pointed out that the PTF in question was for something else. Or at >least that was my intention. > >UPRO1GPF came along in 1.9 and is documented in the SDSF manual (9.2.2 in the >1.9 level). > Aha! Now I get it. The confusion comes from the subject line and from Bob Richards. I'm used to getting confused by him! (just kidding Bob) Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[email protected] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
