Should someone submit a requirement that IBM provide an automated process to convert PLX macros to Assembler, COBOL, PL1, C/C++ and maybe JAVA. This might eliminate the problem of bad equates and other missed translations.
On 27 Sep 2005 14:54:31 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc) wrote: >APAR OA13568 for IGDSGCL and IEFSSSA > >Roland > >-----Original Message----- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould >Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 12:42 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: IBM-Macros wrong > > >On Sep 24, 2005, at 4:41 PM, Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc wrote: > >> IGDSGCL is bad in z/OS R5, R6. >> IEFSSSA miss some assembler equates (R5/R6) >> Perhaps same apply to R7 >> >> Both works fine using PLX. No wonder. >> >> As usual it's a pain to code plain assembler. >> >> > >Roland, > > >Just curious as to how do you handle "bad" IBM macros... > >Do you APAR them, fix them (if you can) or do you put them in >the source of you program and fix them there ) > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
