Ted MacNEIL pisze:
[...]
Sysplex was meant as a way for the systems to grow up and to achieve higher
levels of availability.
You are limiting what can be done with a proper exploitation of SYSPLEX.
Many things CAN be done, but not necessarily were intended by designer.
As I said, there's nothing wrong in such usage, but it could yield
unusual issues.
It wasn't a method to merge several
applications under one system.
I disagree, as I've already stated.
We couldn't merge our two IMS applications, and get rid of XRF, without SYSPLEX.
Q1: Why did you merge the systems? What was a goal? To have lower fees?
That would mean priceplex. If the systems remained to be independent
then technically it would be reasonable to have two independent sysplexes.
Q2: Wasn't it possible to expand one of the system to sysplex and then
migrate THE APPLICATION from another system?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego,
nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 0000025237
NIP: 526-021-50-88
Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2009 r. kapitał zakładowy BRE Banku SA (w całości
wpłacony) wynosi 118.763.528 złotych. W związku z realizacją warunkowego
podwyższenia kapitału zakładowego, na podstawie uchwały XXI WZ z dnia 16 marca
2008r., oraz uchwały XVI NWZ z dnia 27 października 2008r., może ulec
podwyższeniu do kwoty 123.763.528 zł. Akcje w podwyższonym kapitale zakładowym
BRE Banku SA będą w całości opłacone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
