In a message dated 9/29/2005 8:23:26 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Before  TIOTs were moved above the line, this maximum was about 1/2 as  
large.  
I ran a test in 1977 with the maximum number (somewhere around  1637)  and 
the job worked.  I added one more DD statement into the  step  and it failed 
with 
a JCL error.



>>
Few years later, we were having terrible problems with VSCR and
ESP'd XA, DF/EF, JES3 and all the asscoiated NDA's and upgrades.
SWAREQ I think was a bigger problem than TIOT. IIRC it got
moved upstairs with XA 2.1.5(a few years  later). 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to