You mentioned the segmentation offload fix (for OSA cards).
I'm VERY curious to know if anyone has actually worked up the courage to
turn this option back on.  Are the results worth the extra Zantac
required just thinking about it?

Dennis Barrett
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Knutson, Sam [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 14:34
Subject: Re: OA25072 RESOLVE KNOWN ISSUES WITH CATALOG AUTO-TUNING

Hi,

The APAR is not flagged CATBREAKER.  If this is really intended to
resolve broken catalog issues it seems like it should be.  If the dire
symptoms you describe are being seen it seems it should be marked HIPER
too.  That was part of my point that this APAR has been open a LONG time
to just close it and turn off the feature rather than fixing it.  Even
segmentation offload was eventually fixed and recommended to be enabled.
The APAR text makes it sound like it was just ineffective at making an
improvement or confusing.

        Best Regards, 

                Sam Knutson, GEICO 
                System z Performance and Availability Management 
                mailto:[email protected] 
                (office)  301.986.3574 
                (cell) 301.996.1318              

"Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast..." 


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Pinnacle
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OA25072 RESOLVE KNOWN ISSUES WITH CATALOG AUTO-TUNING

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Knutson, Sam" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:13 AM
Subject: OA25072 RESOLVE KNOWN ISSUES WITH CATALOG AUTO-TUNING


> http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA25072
>
> I have not seen any big shortcomings with Auto-Tuning here though I am

> sure others have.
> It seems this is throwing the baby out with the bathwater since it
just 
> completely kills auto-tuning rather than providing a chicken switch
for 
> customers who were unhappy.  Anyone seen anything so horrible from
catalog 
> auto-tuning you are happy IBM fired up the time machine and erased it 
> completely?
>

Sam,

OA20748 has been out there for 2.5 years.  IBM recommended disabling 
AUTOTUNING in that APAR, and I've been doing that ever since.  The main 
problems were broken catalogs and runaway CPU in VLF.  We experienced
the 
runaway CPU problem.  I'm glad you haven't had any problems, but
AUTOTUNING 
has been BAD from day 1.

Tom 

====================
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this
email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to