On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kirk Talman <[email protected]> wrote:
> A utility macro that issues SWAREQ UNAUTH=YES has abended w/S0C1 because > it was used in 24 bit mode. IFA says at the BALR R14,R15 but I think the > problem is the BR R14 returning. > > The macro is used in multiple places/programs. This is the first abend. > It is hard to believe the utility that abended had not been used before > this w/zOS 1.10? Has anyone else seen/heard of this? Any idea why BALR > used instead of BASR? > It wouldn't matter anyway. Neither of those changes the amode. That would require BASSM, or BSM or in z architecture, SAM. Is SWAREQ documented to allow 24-bit mode callers? (I really don't know without looking it up) -- This email might be from the artist formerly known as CC (or not) You be the judge. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
