>I'm sure it has to do with the fact I'm using GDGs with (+1). When I was using >a refer back to DUMP1, TAPE1 and RETAIN it was dropping the tape after step >one and dying.
GDG's are funny in the way relative generations work. The catalogue is not fully updated until after the job finished. So, if you are creating two generations in the same job, the second one has to be '(+2)'. '(+1)', even in a later step refers to the original 'new' generation. This continues with subsequent generations within the same job. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
