On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:23:16 -0600, R Hey <sys...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>It's been recommended NOT to use Imp 1 in WLM.
>
>My client has been using Imp1 for online CICS.
>
>I’m planning to change it to use Imp2 buy changing all Imp to Imp+1.
>
>Can you think of any potential problems/issues?
>
>TIA,
>Rez
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

One thought here is that, when your management comes to you and says to 
increase priority (meaning throughput) of an IMP 1 address space, your only 
option will be to decrease the importance of all other IMP 1 address spaces.  
(It's not a matter of IF; it's a matter of WHEN!)  A rather nasty undertaking!  
If you leave some room at the top, you will have room to increase the 
importance level of a single address space.  This is not to say that you 
shouldn't have IMP 1 service classes; just leave a little wiggle room for when 
that time comes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to