"Barbara Nitz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<listserv%[email protected]>...
> >A hypothetical question.  What are the major implications of changing
> >the sysplex name?  What are the gotcha's?  
> 
> >-    a fairly large parallel sysplex with > 15 participating lpars
> >-    60+ terabytes of DASD, mostly SMS managed
> >-    SMSPLEX same scope as SYSPLEX
> >-    Sysplex restart needed(all systems down at once)
> >-    Re-allocation of various system datasets with sysplex name as a
> >qualifier
> >-    New CF policies
> 
> The biggest gotcha (in my opinion) is that you have to define all new
couple 
> data sets - the sysplex name is in all of them, not just in the CFRM
CDS. You 
> will do a real cold start on freshly formatted datasets. Come to think
of that - 
> I am not sure how to handle the LOGR CDS if you cannot cold start the
log 
> stream. (We did not have that problem.)
> 
> In addition, you don't get a 'test' in the sense that you can do
things before 
> all systems are taken down. Changing &sysplex (and possibly the
related 
> symbols derived from &sysplex) everywhere in the data set names is
hard 
> work. In our case, it wasn't just 'system data sets'. Some of those
need the 
> historical data that were in them, written right until the system was
taken 
> down.
> 
> Regards, Barbara Nitz

I can recommend a (completely separated) Test-Sysplex for this and other
potentially dangerous changes (SMS config, GDPS, Sysplex CDSs, catalog
modifications/recoverytests etc...). We are very happy to have one.

Kees.
**********************************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part
of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
by return e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries
and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor
responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal
Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with
registered number 33014286 
**********************************************************************

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to