Andrew Metcalfe wrote: > Hello Listers > > I realise that this subject is old, old, old but ....we have never had a > requirement to move UCBs above 16M as we have been happily running with a > private region of 8M and have not seen any CSA (below) issues. We are now > looking at a strategy of consolidating workloads on fewer z/OS systems and > hence expect to see an increase in both CSA usage and SQA as more devices > are defined to each system. > > I have seen the Redbook (SG24-4584 from 1995!) which gives some information, > but I can't see anything from recent times. Can anyone please point me at > some recent conventional wisdom, or is moving UCBs above a "non-event"? > > Thanks > > Andrew Metcalfe > Barclays Bank Plc > > > > >
Unless you are running very, very old ISV software it should be a non-event from a system software standpoint. If you have any home written programs that process UCB's and made assumptions about their location, you might have some problems there however. -- Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service Tampa, FL ---- Aside from a cold appreciation of my own genius I felt that I was a modest man. Robert A. Heinlein Double Star(1956) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
