On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:56:36 -0600, Daniel McLaughlin wrote: > >Last bugaboo...EXEC gets (-3) executing the RACF ALU command. My guess is >because of running IRXJCL V. IKJEFT01. I'm also guessing that since the >batch ID has no TSO segment that ADDRESS TSO wouldn't help. > TSO segment has little to do with it: ADDRESS TSO is simply unavailable under IRXJCL regardless. (Well, barring the byzantine ADDRESS SYSCALL spawn of an EXEC which could issue the Unix-peculiar flavor of ADDRESS TSO.)
>Suggestions? (Going to try IKJEFT01 and see what happens.) > Does IKJEFT01 require a TSO segment? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
