sounded like another pin-head --- no nothing in charge ....
From: "Chase, John" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 12/21/2009 02:39 PM Subject: Re: Union Pacific Railroad ditches its mainframe for SOA Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Roach, Dennis (N-GHG) > > Cross posted due to the UP system being in assembler. > > http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/344916/Railroad_Crossing_When_Mai nframe_Meets_SOA?source=CTWNLE > _nlt_thisweek_2009-12-21 "The old system wouldn't have been able to handle that change" is utter bull$h1t. More believable (and probably more correct) might have been something like "The cost in both time and money to implement that change in the old system would have been prohibitive." -jc- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Email Disclaimer This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
