Ed delicately pointed out that I missed the point when I said; > >>Certainly those users didn't accidentally pull up view instead of > >>browse. > > > >Actually they probably did. > > > > Re-read the original post, Chris. The users ran up against the > artificial storage limit the OP placed into the ISPF configuration. If > this had simply been VIEW vs BROWSE, they would have just changed to > BROWSE and moved on. Instead, they went to considerable effort to get > around the restriction. They discovered and exploited a "hole" in ISPF's > limit checking that allows them to EDIT a small file and then copy in > the "large" one they *really* want to EDIT. Sounds to me like they > deserve a raise! :-)
Um. Yes. You're right of course. Maybe they do need a raise! Or maybe I need another week off. Perhaps two. CC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
