In <[email protected]>, on
02/24/2010
   at 04:44 PM, [email protected] said:

>WYLBUR was used by Stanford and SLAC, and by some other academic 
>institutions. 

Wylbur was used by a lot of shops, but I'm not aware of anyone else using
ORVYL.

>There's a commercial version called SuperWylbur, 

AFAIK they still market it.

>I think there was another commercial 
>version called Interact from Online Business Systems,

Two different products, eventually under one roof. Gerhard, can you give a
blow by blow history?

>And there were rumors of a DOS or Windows versions, but I was never able
> to track it down.

I've heard of subsets on a PC, but never a full implementation.

>I think there was a 
>version that offloaded some of the work to a 7171 controller.

Eventually they all supported 3270 terminals, or do you mean something on
the 7171 beyond simulating a 3270?

>An article about the retirement of the mainframe it ran on: 

I believe that Stanford ran Wylbur on a 360/75 and Orvyl on a 360/67.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to