On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:27:07 -0600 Dave Day <[email protected]> wrote:
:> I have a similar function within my code, and use a LATCH to serialize. When the server comes up, it defines the set of Latches needed. Both PASN=HASN and PASN ne HASN code that runs in my address space use the latches. Seems to work fine, as far as I can tell. Would a latch outperform a lock? My thought to use PLO is that it is direct hardware serialization. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
