Paul Gilmartin wrote:
And I see that GIMSMP is linked with AC=1; ASMA90 with AC=0;
both in authorized libraries.
So, now sheer conjecture. ASMA90 may or may not do exhaustive
SAF checking. Why should it feel obliged to? It was designed
to run unauthorized. So a maliciously crafty programmer could
code an SMP/E APPLY step which invokes ASMA90; preallocate
SYSPUNCH; and supply PUNCH statements which overwrite a member
in what? SYS1.PARMLIB?
Or have your HLASM source/library/print user exits now suddenly getting
control in an authorized environment.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
[email protected]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
